Klfoodie

https://www.sciencedirect.com › science › article › pii
Here we evaluated VO 2 max estimates from Apple Watch Series 10 against indirect calorimetry to inform their use in clinical research and personal health contexts

https://journals.plos.org › plosone › article
This study aimed to assess the validity of VO2 max estimates from Apple Watch in comparison to indirect calorimetry Thirty participants wore an Apple Watch for 5 10 days to generate

https://read.qxmd.com › ...
OBJECTIVE To assess the validity of maximal oxygen uptake VO2 max estimates from Apple Watch Series 10 through comparison with indirect calorimetry the criterion method

https://visualize.jove.com
The Apple Watch Series 10 underestimates maximal oxygen uptake VO2 max compared to indirect calorimetry While not accurate for individual assessment it may be useful for

https://econpapers.repec.org
This study aimed to assess the validity of VO2 max estimates from Apple Watch in comparison to indirect calorimetry Thirty participants wore an Apple Watch for 5 10 days to generate a VO2 max

https://world.physio › congress-proceeding
The primary aim of this study was to assess the validity of VO 2 max estimations from Apple Watch compared to indirect calorimetry with a secondary aim to evaluate the accuracy of heart rate and

https://doaj.org › article
This study aimed to assess the validity of VO2 max estimates from Apple Watch in comparison to indirect calorimetry Thirty participants wore an Apple Watch for 5 10 days to generate a VO2 max

https://www.nature.com › articles
Apple Watch provides continuous monitoring of physiological and behavioural health metrics increasingly used to support health care delivery Yet evidence regarding its measurement

https://biologyinsights.com
Apple Watch VO2 max estimates are off by about 13 on average compared to gold standard lab testing based on validation studies that put the watch head to head against clinical